Scamando
My feedback
-
14 votesScamando
supported this idea
·
-
14 votesScamando
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
5 votesScamando
shared this idea
·
-
20 votesScamando
supported this idea
·
-
58 votesScamando
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Scamando
commented
Yes, I agree, the cloning process should have more options that allow application database name, crudentials, ect.
This is really needed.
-
83 votesScamando
supported this idea
·
-
169 votesScamando
supported this idea
·
-
77 votesScamando
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesScamando
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesScamando
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Scamando
commented
This would be great. This would be very useful.
-
11 votes
AdminCloudways
(Admin, Cloudways)
responded
The logic behind keeping same creds is that many people use this feature to create test/dev environments, so it is convenient for them to have it like this.
In any case, for the flow you mention, you could clone a template from server A to server B. Then on server B, keep the first copy of the app as a template and clone it (on the same server) as many times as needed. Cloning on the same server changes all credentials, so this should work for you?.
Cloudways Team
An error occurred while saving the comment Scamando
commented
Yes, this would be awesome. It requires 2x cloning to make this work right now. First I have to clone to current server. Then I have to clone that new clone to other server. Then I have delete the first clone. Insane process. There should be an option that allows you to checkmark, "keep installation name, or create new name" when cloning to another server.
https://getflywheel.com/why-flywheel/blueprints/ - This allows you to create multiple backups, Something like this would be ideal.
Scamando
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesScamando
shared this idea
·
-
316 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Scamando
commented
I agree with the many comments here. The pricing is inconsistent with both other providers and provider them self. You should be charging a flat% across the board for all providers. Taking the cheapest provider and adding higher cost because "you can" does not leave a good taste for most people here.
Scamando
supported this idea
·
Yes, please add screenshot thumbnail for each application so we can visually scan and choose what we are looking for. A grid would be great. The current layout is wasting so much white space.